Healthcare Acquired
Infections in Long Term Care
facilities:
Mobile (Portable)
Diagnostic Imaging and C. diff. prevention
“Most nursing homes are not paying enough attention to the
whole C. diff. issue.”
-Dr. Cliff McDonald, MD, Prevention and Response Branch Chief
CDC Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion
Clostridium difficile: Background and Statistics
Clostridium difficile, or C. diff., is a microorganism
commonly found in the intestines of many healthy people as part of the normal
intestinal flora. In conditions often
associated with long term care patients, C. diff can quickly multiply to
dangerous levels. In amplified amounts,
the microorganism releases enough toxins, normally harmless, to successfully
attack the intestinal lining and cause severe diarrhea. Worse, when a person may have a compromised
immune system, the infection can rapidly progress and cause toxic megacolon,
sepsis and even death.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 94% of C. diff. infections are associated
with receiving some sort of health care.
Of that 94%, the CDC reports that 75% of healthcare acquired C. diff.
infections occur in patients discharged into a long-term care (LTC) facility or
back into the home following hospitalization.
According to Dr. Cliff McDonald, MD, Prevention and Response Branch
Chief, CDC Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, “More than three-fourths
of C. diff. infections in nursing homes occur within four weeks after a
resident is discharged from an acute care hospital.”
In the long-term care population, the number of C. diff.
cases has risen to over 263,000 annually.
Although the annual C. diff. mortality count amongst the entire U.S.
population is significantly less at 16,500, the percentage of these deaths
occurring in people over age 65 has skyrocketed to 90%. Considering these numbers only reflect
reported cases of C. diff., we can
estimate conservatively that between 4-6% of C. diff. patients in the LTC
setting pass away prematurely from this preventable infection.
Why focus on C. Diff?
C. diff. infections are a growing problem and of particular
concern for the LTC community for a variety of reasons. The clinical challenges and impending financial
consequences, along with a target-rich patient population, should make C. diff.
infections and infection control a top priority. The idiosyncratic nature of C. diff., as
opposed to other healthcare acquired infections (HAIs), also presents the
necessity for a focused evaluation of infection control protocols. Finally, while statistics demonstrate that as
a whole, HAIs are trending downward as healthcare workers become more astute in
prevention, containment and treatment; C. diff. has climbed to historic highs
in recent years and remains a mystery to many seasoned and reputable
caregivers. The LTC community is
beginning to realize that C. diff. is no longer a problem only in hospital
settings and as the CDC recognizes, these infections are a patient safety
concern everywhere medical care is provided.
Clinical Challenges:
Risk Factors for infection; Methods of transmission; and Prevention.
Richard Schwalberg, Administrator at Menorah Park, a large,
multi-location, long term care network in Cleveland, Ohio, sums up the clinical
challenges of preventing C. diff. simply and succinctly. “Any healthcare worker who moves from room to
room, such as nurses or housekeeping, has the potential to transmit the
infection,” he begins, “The question is how much training are they getting in
precautions and are they thinking about it on the job.”
C. diff. is a bacteria that produces spores that can live
for 30 days or more outside of the body and because the spores are resistant to
traditional disinfectants, they can be readily spread throughout a LTC facility
even while following standard infection control procedures. Without proper precautions, the bacteria may
be present on medical equipment and other surfaces long after a patient has
recovered, moved to another room or even after discharge. Researchers have reported C. diff. contamination
on 10% to 50% of everything from bed sheets to electric thermometer and even on
windowsills. No surface in a room with a
confirmed C. diff. patient is safe from the invasive spores.
Once C. diff. spores are present, patients, caregivers, visitors,
and even equipment moved in and out of the room become potential
transmitters. Under standard infection
control procedures a quick wipe with an approved disinfectant, removing your
gloves after an examination, or a dab of instant hand sanitizer may be enough
to prevent further spread of most HAIs, but C. diff. lingers long after these
precautions are implemented. Alcohol, regular
disinfectant solutions and hand sanitizers do not kill C. diff. Chlorine-based agents with sporicidal action
against the C. diff. spores have been approved to disinfect and prevent spread,
but their caustic nature has prevented them from being universally
embraced. Recently, the EPA has approved
a line of disinfectant products containing silver ions as an effective agent against
C. diff. The new product is
non-corrosive and safe for use on delicate screens, probes and other medical
equipment. As mentioned before, while
HAIs are being reduced largely in part to more effective standard infection
control protocols, C. diff. containment requires a more target-specific
approach to decontamination, so incidence of C. diff. infection and spread are
increasing at an alarming and unacceptable rate.
Another increasingly evident factor in the struggle to
prevent C. diff. is the lack of awareness the average healthcare worker has
about the bacteria. As Richard
Schwalberg asked, “How much training are they getting in precautions and are
they thinking about it on the job?” Unless
a facility deliberately trains staff on the differences between C. diff
prevention and protocols versus standard HAI prevention and protocol, most LTC
caregivers think traditional precautions are sufficient. As we just demonstrated, these universally
accepted standards fall short of what it takes to prevent C. diff. In a recent study, 35 healthcare workers were
tested for C. diff. after direct contact with an infected patient and 59% of
them tested positive. Two interesting
lessons are learned from these results.
First, 59% of the healthcare workers failed at some point in preventing
the spread of C. diff. Second, with such
a high percent of infected healthcare workers, why is the rate of C. diff.
infection reported so low amongst them?
A Target-Rich
Population: LTC Patients and C. diff. infection
As mentioned above, C. diff. is often found in the normal
intestinal flora of healthy individuals.
Our bodies keep the bacteria under control and we can go about our lives
without incident. For this reason, many
healthcare workers that fail to take the necessary steps to guard against not
only transmitting, but actually acquiring C. diff. are often non-symptomatic
and are never reported as being infected.
However, the LTC population usually doesn’t get the same biological and
beneficial hall pass.
According to research, the major risk factors for developing
C. diff. infection are:
1.
Over age 65
2.
Frail, elderly or otherwise not in perfect
health
3.
Compromised immune system
4.
Recent history of antibiotics
Unfortunately, one or more of these factors may apply to
most or all of an LTC population at any given moment. To further complicate a risk assessment, in
an LTC setting, the highest risk patients are those recently discharged from a
hospital after a short-term rehabilitation or nursing stay.
Dr. Cliff McDonald assess the risk of the entire LTC
population in terms of level of care, “In the 15,000 nursing homes in the
United States we have a high percentage of patients who are sub-acute; and
that’s the population most at risk for C. diff. because they have been primed
with a lot of heavy duty antibiotics.”
Antibiotics kill the bacteria in the gut that normally prevent
infection, leaving the path open for C. diff. to multiply.
With a plethora of hosts that provide a rich environment for
C. diff. to thrive and a lack of protocols to prevent it from spreading, the
risk of an outbreak is looming for many LTC facilities.
The cost of infection:
C. diff. and bottom line impact
Although there have been many published reports of hospitals
and LTC facilities implementing enhanced environmental cleaning and equipment
decontamination in the past three years, many have yet to monitor and track the
efficacy of the programs. From a patient
care perspective, implementing these and other infection control measures, even
lacking a tracking element, is a win-win.
LTC facilities that successfully reduce HAI rates and provide an
excellent patient experience gain a positive community reputation and gain the
trust of local hospitals for referrals; both which are good for business and
patients. Until now, however, there
hasn’t been a need to add the tracking element.
In 2014 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
will require hospitals to report C. diff. infection rates and will partially
weigh the annual payment update based on the results. Currently, hospitals voluntarily submit data
to avoid a 2% reduction in payment. LTC
experts believe the same financial carrot and stick will be implemented for LTC
facilities. Unacceptable C. diff. rates
will eventually translate to reduced reimbursement. The future success of LTC budgeting will be
heavily influenced by C. diff. and other HAI rates and a proactive approach
will include internal infection control strategy evaluation as well as HAI and
C. diff. transmission protocols for contracted healthcare providers, such as
mobile imaging, phlebotomy, and lab companies.
Currently, even a C. diff. case that ends in recovery rather
than fatality is a heavy financial burden on LTC facilities. Reports estimate that each case may cost in
the range of $5000 - $7000; adding up to $2.2 billion nationally. By taking C. diff. prevention a step further,
investing time and money now to bring the rate of incidence under control, an
LTC facility could potentially save significant dollars all while adding to the
strong community reputation and industry respect that ultimately drive the
bottom line.
Mobile Imaging Providers: Our role in C. diff. Prevention
A responsible imaging provider should be part of your
solution to reduce C. diff. infections.
At Source Diagnostics, we are ahead of the pack for infection control,
specifically C. diff. prevention and containment. We have developed and implemented infection
control protocols and all Source Diagnostics personnel are trained in our
proprietary methods. Our program is
designed to protect your patients’ health and acknowledges the need for
stronger awareness than standard infection control. Our clients can expect that the Technologist
or Sonographer entering their LTC facility is fully trained and compliant with
our protocols.
As a leader in mobile imaging to the long term care
industry, Source Diagnostics pushes the boundary of necessity and operates in
the twilight of the rising sun. We know
what you need now, but we work to anticipate what is in store in the
future. For this reason, we are
partnering with our clients as a resource for the multi-faceted approach
necessary to comply with future CMS regulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment